I prioritize mental well-being by intentionally disconnecting from social networks, choosing to engage more thoughtfully with the world around me. My skepticism of mainstream media stems from its frequent lack of transparency and impartiality, often swayed by political or corporate interests. This has led to widespread distrust, as news outlets increasingly prioritize agendas over objective reporting. The rise of social media and alternative news sources has only muddied the waters, making it harder to distinguish fact from fiction.
What concerns me most is the erosion of reliable information. Institutions like governments and fact-checking organizations—once trusted to verify facts—are now seen as compromised or ineffective. With governments manipulating information for political gain and fact-checkers influenced by the very systems they monitor, the line between truth and propaganda has become dangerously blurred. This uncertainty undermines democracy, public health, and social cohesion.
In this context, skepticism isn’t just healthy—it’s essential. We must question the sources, motives, and context of the information we consume. Rebuilding trust in our institutions requires transparency, accountability, and an unwavering commitment to truth.
Additionally, the monetization models of social media platforms have led many content creators to prioritize views over integrity. With clicks and engagement driving income, sensationalism often trumps accuracy, contributing to the spread of misinformation. This creates a culture where entertainment is valued over well-researched, credible content, further fueling societal divisions.
As consumers, it’s crucial to be discerning. We must understand the motivations behind the content we engage with and recognize when sensationalism outweighs truth. In a world driven by clicks and views, it's our responsibility to seek out trustworthy sources and challenge the narratives we’re fed.
Pascal